[HTML][HTML] Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis

J Bolaños-Meade, M Hamadani, J Wu… - … England Journal of …, 2023 - Mass Medical Soc
J Bolaños-Meade, M Hamadani, J Wu, MM Al Malki, MJ Martens, L Runaas, H Elmariah…
New England Journal of Medicine, 2023Mass Medical Soc
Background In patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation
(HSCT), a calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate has been a standard prophylaxis against
graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). A phase 2 study indicated the potential superiority of a
post-transplantation regimen of cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil.
Methods In a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with hematologic cancers in a 1: 1
ratio to receive cyclophosphamide–tacrolimus–mycophenolate mofetil (experimental …
Background
In patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), a calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate has been a standard prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). A phase 2 study indicated the potential superiority of a post-transplantation regimen of cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil.
Methods
In a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with hematologic cancers in a 1:1 ratio to receive cyclophosphamide–tacrolimus–mycophenolate mofetil (experimental prophylaxis) or tacrolimus–methotrexate (standard prophylaxis). The patients underwent HSCT from an HLA-matched related donor or a matched or 7/8 mismatched (i.e., mismatched at only one of the HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1 loci) unrelated donor, after reduced-intensity conditioning. The primary end point was GVHD-free, relapse-free survival at 1 year, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, with events defined as grade III or IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD warranting systemic immunosuppression, disease relapse or progression, and death from any cause.
Results
In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was significantly more common among the 214 patients in the experimental-prophylaxis group than among the 217 patients in the standard-prophylaxis group (hazard ratio for grade III or IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, disease relapse or progression, or death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.83; P=0.001). At 1 year, the adjusted GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was 52.7% (95% CI, 45.8 to 59.2) with experimental prophylaxis and 34.9% (95% CI, 28.6 to 41.3) with standard prophylaxis. Patients in the experimental-prophylaxis group appeared to have less severe acute or chronic GVHD and a higher incidence of immunosuppression-free survival at 1 year. Overall and disease-free survival, relapse, transplantation-related death, and engraftment did not differ substantially between the groups.
Conclusions
Among patients undergoing allogeneic HLA-matched HSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning, GVHD-free, relapse-free survival at 1 year was significantly more common among those who received cyclophosphamide–tacrolimus–mycophenolate mofetil than among those who received tacrolimus–methotrexate. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; BMT CTN 1703 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03959241.)
The New England Journal Of Medicine